What makes being a Drag King appealing?Drag Kings have the ability to portray a female or male role at any point in time. Mostadmit they don’t want to be completely or permanently male.Drag Kings find portraying a male exhilarating and erotic. Why BE A drag King?Drag Kings appreciate the transition from female to male. What’s a Drag King?In the film, a Drag King is described as a person who wants gender euphoria, and has accepted their female masculinity.It is also described as “female performance artists who dress in masculine drag and personify male gender stereotypes as part of the performance” (Halberstam230).Venus Boyz screen snapshot
DRAG KINGS FULL
So while Austin Powers parodically reenacts a long tradition of secret-agent films and raids the coffers of sexist British humor from Benny Hill to the Carry On comedies, The Full Monty forces its lads.I’ve heard of a Drag Queen but….New York City Pride Festival Summer 2007Janna Gomez King comedies also capitalize on the humor that comes from revealing the derivative nature of dominant masculinities, and so they trade heavily in the tropes of doubling, disguise, and impersonation. Indeed, the king comedy attempts to exploit not the power but the frailty of the male body for the purpose of generating laughs at the hero's expense. Both of these "king comedies," as I like to call them, using king as a more precise term than camp, were built around the surprising vulnerabilities of the English male body and psyche.
The Full Monty, for example, was made for only $3 million, but within a few months it had made twice that much at the box office. Jay Roach) both took American audiences by surprise. Peter Cattaneo) and Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (dir. Yet profit is not ultimately the best gauge of success, and it may well be that by tracing a cultural phenomenon back to its source, we restore a different kind of prestige to the subculture and honor its creativity in the process.įor abject English masculinity films, 1997 was a banner year: The Full Monty (dir. One obvious way to trace the difference between the dominant and the marginal in this instance is to see who becomes rich from certain performances of male parody and who never materially benefits at all. Tracing the mysterious process by which, say, a performance in a queer nightclub or a genre of queer humor or a specific mode of parody has been observed, appreciated, and then reproduced is not simple and has much to offer future studies of the ever more complex lines of affiliation between the marginal and the dominant. Furthermore, I emphasize the utility of tracking precisely when, where, and how the subculture is "beamed up" into the mainstream. I take for granted Dick Hebdige's formulation of subcultures as marginalized cultures that are quickly absorbed by capitalism and then robbed of their oppositional power, 1 but I will expand on Hebdige's influential reading of subcultures by arguing that some subcultures do not simply fade away as soon as they have been plundered for material.
DRAG KINGS HOW TO
My contention will not be that straight men learn how to parody masculinity from butch women and then take that parody to the bank rather, I will try to map circuits of subcultural influence across a wide range of textual play. This essay will trace the strange and barely discernible influence of lesbian drag-king cultures on hetero-male comic film. However, these relations are for the most part submerged and mediated and difficult to read. This is not to say that no relations exist between the way lesbians produce and circulate cultures of masculinity and the way men do.
While the dynamic between lesbians and hetero-males could change significantly in the next few decades as more and more lesbians become parents and raise sons, for the moment there seem to be no sitcoms on the horizon ready to exploit the humorous possibilities of interactions between a masculine woman and her butch guy pal.
DRAG KINGS TV
The "fag hag" role has become a staple feature of popular film, and at least part of the explanation for how gay male culture and gay male images have so thoroughly penetrated popular film and TV cultures lies in the recognized and indeed lived experience of bonds between "queens" and "girls." There is no such parallel between lesbians and straight men. There has been much ink spilled in the popular media and in popular queer culture about the intimate relations between gay men and straight women. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 7.3 (2001) 425-452 In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: